Index of Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is a GORE™ Survey?
The GORE™ Survey (formerly known as the GORE-SORBER® Screening Survey) is the most accurate, comprehensive, and proven passive sampling technology, which allows environmental consultants to identify and map volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in air, soil and water. The survey is used for site assessment, optimizing remediation programs and monitoring, vapor intrusion investigations, and surface and ground water sampling and monitoring. The survey includes GORE™ Modules, analysis, data reporting in spreadsheet format, contaminant contour mapping, and a final report, in paper and electronic formats.
[ Back to Top ]
2. Where can GORE™ Modules be deployed?
The unique construction of the GORE™ Module allows it to be placed in unsaturated and saturated soils, sediments, groundwater and other aqueous environments, beneath building slabs and other paved areas, and in outdoor and indoor air environments. No further modification or calibration to the module is necessary to sample any of these environments, making the GORE™ Module a universal sampler.
[ Back to Top ]
3. Can the GORE™ Survey be used in vapor intrusion investigations?
Yes, the survey is well-suited for vapor intrusion investigations. The high sensitivity, minimal data variability and accuracy of a passive, time-integrated, sorbent-based sampler, combined with the simple and unobtrusive installation in soils, beneath slabs, and in air, makes the GORE™ Survey a viable and effective sampling alternative to active vapor sampling methods.
The GORE™ Survey is an effective initial site characterization tool for vapor intrusion investigations. With the ability to report data in vapor concentration units, risk assessments can also be ascertained.
[ Back to Top ]
4. Can the GORETM Module be used to monitor concentration trends of compounds in groundwater?
Yes! The US EPA ETV program verified this application claim. The modules can be deployed easily in wells as small as one-half inch in diameter. Uptake of compounds dissolved in water is rapid, (typically one hour) and the data can be reported in units of mass and/or concentration. In general, there is a strong correlation between the groundwater data collected passively and with conventional methods. The associated low field costs, non-purge requirements, and unobtrusive sampling make this a viable, effective groundwater sampling alternative.
[ Back to Top ]
5. How well has the GORE™ Survey been received?
The feedback continues to be extremely positive, and there has been an overwhelming response to its acceptance by environmental consultants, end-users, and regulators. Users are continually impressed with the versatility of the collector, the quality of the data, and the level of technical support. With the concentration reporting capability, the survey is more versatile.
[ Back to Top ]
6. How long has the GORE™ Survey been available?
The GORE™ Survey was introduced in late 1992. Since that time, over 3,000 surveys have been completed worldwide, for virtually all site types and geological and climatological conditions - in air, soil and water.
[ Back to Top ]
7. What soil gas survey design issue impacts results?
Undersampling! In an effort to save money, undersampling during the site characterization part of the environmental investigation may occur. In other words, not enough samples are collected to characterize the site properly. Questions pertaining to the subsurface impact are inadequately answered, leading to uncertainty, an unhappy client, and additional regulator scrutiny. The next phase is to expand the soil gas survey, which increases the overall project cost, and adds significant time to the site investigation for all parties involved. Undersampling should be avoided.
[ Back to Top ]
8. For soil gas sampling, what sample spacing do you recommend?
The size of the area under investigation, the objective of the survey, and the funds available largely dictate sample spacing. For soil gas sampling, we recommend a sample spacing of 25 to 70 feet, with many surveys utilizing a 50-foot sample spacing. If the objective is to pinpoint the locations of likely sources of contamination, or define a fracture in bedrock for example, then smaller sample spacing is recommended. Larger sample spacing can be employed in areas not believed to be contaminated or if the objective is a broad screening of a large area. If contamination is encountered in these areas, subsequent high-resolution soil gas sampling can be completed later and combined onto one set of maps, resolving the subsurface impact accurately.
[ Back to Top ]
9. What is the typical time frame to complete a GORE™ Survey?
A Final Report is issued approximately two to four weeks following the receipt of the modules at Gore's laboratory. This time includes the seven to ten business day analysis period, along with the subsequent data table generation, contour mapping, and final report preparation. If a shorter turn around time is required, please call.
[ Back to Top ]
10. How does the GORETM Module collect chemical compounds?
The GORETM Module (formerly known as the GORE-SORBER® Screening Module) is constructed of a GORE-TEX® membrane tube, a chemically-inert, waterproof, yet vapor-permeable polymer, which houses engineered adsorbents. Volatile and semi-volatile compounds present in air, soil gas or water diffuse unimpeded through the membrane to the adsorbent material, while liquid water and soil particles are prevented from contacting the adsorbent. The membrane has over 80% open area and pore sizes that are 1,000 times larger than the largest SVOC molecule, thus offering essentially no resistance to vapor migration to the adsorbent. Compounds moving to the inside of the membrane are immediately collected by the adsorbents.
[ Back to Top ]
11. Can the GORETM Modules be placed in saturated soils, sediment and water?
Yes! The waterproof, vapor permeable membrane construction of the module allows it to be placed in virtually any aqueous or saturated soil environment. Dissolved contaminants present partition to vapor, move across the membrane and onto the adsorbent. Modules can be used to monitor trends in groundwater quality by placing the module in the screened intervals of monitoring wells. The hydrophobic nature of the standard membrane and the small pore size, prevent liquid water from penetrating the membrane to depths of 30 feet of water.
[ Back to Top ]
12. Is the GORE™ Survey an accepted approach to sampling volatile and semivolatile compounds in air, soil, and water?
The GORE™ Survey has been approved and accepted for use in numerous workplans by state and federal regulators, and is widely known and used by environmental consultants and regulators alike.
[ Back to Top ]
13. With a fixed amount of adsorbent in each GORETM Module, is saturation an issue?
Ample amounts of adsorbent, and therefore, large numbers of receptor sites for organic molecules are present in the module, and should be suitable for most vapor sampling programs. However, sites known to have high concentrations could saturate the adsorbent during the sampling interval. Similarly, long exposure times could lead to saturation. In the absence of site knowledge, a seven to 14 day exposure period is recommended to identify the most contaminated area.
[ Back to Top ]
1. How should the field installation progress?
For soil gas and subslab sampling, we recommend laying out your sampling grid first before installing the modules into the subsurface. This will allow you to determine the proper sample locations in the field, identify underground utilities, and overcome field obstacles. Once the sample locations are marked (i.e., using pin flags or other non-volatile marking methods), the module installation can begin.
[ Back to Top ]
2. What types of tools are required for drilling the narrow-diameter, holes for soil gas and subslab sampling?
Unobtrusive hand tools are usually all that are required to drill a narrow (¾ inch diameter) hole three feet into the subsurface. The installation hole usually does not require any casing. Slide hammers equipped with tile probes, and rotary hammer drills equipped with carbide tipped drill bits will suffice for most GORETM Module installations. These tools can be purchased from a variety of field equipment vendors or rented from industrial tool rental centers. "Geo-Probe" type tools can be used to create a hole for deeper installations.
[ Back to Top ]
3. What is your recommended sampling depth for passive soil gas sampling?
There are no limitations on depth for sampling soil gas using the GORE™ Module. Sampling depths are somewhat dependent on the investigation objectives and/or site restrictions (e.g., unexploded ordnance).
Soil gas sampling should be collected at a depth to minimize surface and near-surface variables that may influence the soil gas signal. The typical installation of the GORE™ Module is three feet below ground surface. This drilling depth is achievable with simple hand tools. The results of more than 3,000 surveys demonstrate there is no adverse impact on sampling the soil gas at this depth. In addition, successful GORE™ Surveys have been conducted with shallower and deeper module installations.
[ Back to Top ]
4. How are the GORE™ Modules inserted into the subsurface installation holes?
A stainless steel insertion rod is supplied with each GORE™ Survey order. One end of the rod fits into a small pocket cut in the GORE™ Module. The opposite end of the module is tied to a strong cord, which is then tied to a cork (cord and cork supplied by Gore). The assembly is slid into the hole to depth, and the rod extracted. The module will slide off the end of the insertion rod with a quick twist, or by pressing the assembly against the side of the hole when extracting the rod. The hole is sealed with the cork. The module serial number and sample location are noted on the field map, and the Installation and Retrieval Log is updated as the installation progresses to the next sample location. For best results, the insertion rod (and the installation hole drilling equipment) should be cleaned to remove soil, between sample locations.
[ Back to Top ]
5. How are the GORE™ Modules deployed for subslab vapor sampling?
If the objective is to delineate the contaminant impact at depth, then the GORETM Modules should be inserted into narrow-diameter installation holes that extend to at least three feet below the slab and beneath any pooling of vapors under the slab. As with soil gas sampling, the module is secured by a string and cork. The hole can be covered with a bentonite patch for added safety and sample integrity in high traffic areas.
If the sampling is part of a vapor intrusion investigation, the GORETM Modules can be inserted into holes extending immediately beneath the bottom of the slab, and secured as above. For vapor concentration data, exposure times should be one to three days.
[ Back to Top ]
6. How many GORE™ Modules can be installed in a typical day for soil gas sampling?
Under ideal conditions, two (or three) experienced field technicians can install 50 to 70 or more GORETM Modules during a regular workday (this assumes the sample grid has been established prior to the installation, and no significant obstacles are encountered in the field). Typically, one person drills the installation holes, while the second person installs the modules and maintains the field notes, maps, and installation log.
a) For sampling beneath interior building slabs?
The average number installed will depend on drilling time through the slab, and other obstacles encountered, if any.b) For sampling beneath other impermeable surfaces (e.g., parking lots)?
An experienced field crew can install 50 GORETM Modules on average, assuming no significant field obstacles are encountered.c) For sampling indoor and outdoor air?
Deploying the GORETM Module in air is quick and easy. For example, simply suspend the module from an interior ceiling by string at the required height. Numerous modules could be deployed in an hour's time.
[ Back to Top ]
7. How long does it take to retrieve the GORE™ modules following their exposure?
If the sample locations remain marked in the field, also with minimal or no vandalism, the retrieval process takes a fraction of the time it took to install the samples. Two experienced field technicians can retrieve more than 120 modules in a half-day for soil gas investigations. Similar numbers are achievable with subslab and air sampling retrieval events. Field costs may be lowered further by having one technician retrieve the modules.
[ Back to Top ]
8. What is the recommended exposure period for the GORE™ Modules?
For site screening using soil gas or subslab vapor sampling, a 10 to 14-day period will most likely allow the samplers to reach a state of equilibrium with the surrounding environment, and provide a representative site distribution. Longer exposure periods do not appear to be beneficial except at sites where depth to contaminated groundwater is great, the contaminant levels are very low, or the contaminants of concern have high molecular weights such as PAHs. GORE™ Surveys have been successful with exposure periods of a few hours to a few days.
For vapor concentration data reporting, shorter time periods of three days in air and one to seven hours in water, are preferred at sites known or suspected to have high concentrations of contaminants in vapor. This exposure period minimizes the potential for adsorbent saturation.
[ Back to Top ]
9. Do you recommend shipping the GORE™ Modules on ice?
Validation studies were conducted involving module shipping and storage under extreme and varying temperature conditions. The module and sample jar design eliminate any need for refrigerated storage or shipment on ice. This lowers the shipping and handling costs, and increases the flexibility in clients' return shipping schedules.
Gore recommends that steps are taken to ensure a tight seal on the glass container: Remove all visible soil from the jar threads and check to see that the module tubing is not pinched between the jar lid and jar. Over tightening will crack the jar lid.
[ Back to Top ]
1. What types of adsorbents do you use?
Engineered polymeric and carbonaceous adsorbents are used. These adsorbents have a strong affinity for a broad range of compounds (VOCs, SVOCs, and PAHs) present in fuels, chlorinated solvents, and other chemical mixtures, but are hydrophobic (water repellent).
[ Back to Top ]
2. What types of target compounds do you routinely report?
Several target analyte lists are available depending on the compounds of interest, and include petroleum-related and chlorinated compounds. The analytical options include the most commonly requested compounds for environmental investigations, and include compounds in the C2 to C20 range. Non-target compounds that have favorable properties for detection in soil gas can be reported per request.
In addition, explosive breakdown compounds, PCBs, pesticides, herbicides, elemental mercury, sulfur compounds, and chemical warfare breakdown compounds have been successfully reported using the GORETM Module.
If there are compounds of concern that are not part of Gore's analytical options, call us, and our staff of experienced chemists will provide an informed answer as to whether the survey can report those compounds with confidence.
[ Back to Top ]
3. What classes of compounds are not well suited for vapor detection?
The GORE™ Survey has reported compounds as "light" as vinyl chloride through "heavy" compounds up to and including pyrene in the vapor state. Compounds that have very low volatility are generally not good candidates for vapor sampling. Compounds that are highly soluble in water, for example, ketones and alcohols, are typically not available in moist vapor environments, and may not be good candidates for vapor sampling technology. Experience in the field, combined with benchtop experiments, demonstrate compounds should have vapor pressures that exceed ~1.5 x 10-6 mm Hg and a Henry's law constant exceeding ~1.5 x 10-9 atm m3/mole are needed to be detectable in vapor.
If there are compounds of interest that are questionable candidates for detection in vapor, please send your list to Gore, and our staff of experienced chemists will provide feedback regarding the probability of detection.
[ Back to Top ]
4. When the GORE™ Module is placed in water, will it detect and report water soluble compounds?
Yes! Water soluble compounds such as 1,4-dioxane, TBA, and MtBE were detected and reported by the GORETM Module when placed directly in water.
[ Back to Top ]
5. Can the GORE™ Survey report methane?
The GORE™ Survey has reported methane. However, Gore is not satisfied with the reproducibility of the results, and has chosen not to offer methane as a target analyte at this time. However, the survey is capable of collecting alkanes and mercaptans (odorants) to delineate the impact of natural gas and propane.
[ Back to Top ]
6. What analytical methods do you utilize? How confident are you in your abilities to discriminate false results from true contaminant data?
A modified US EPA 8260/8270 analytical method, using gas chromatography (GC) and mass selective detection (MS), following thermal desorption, is used to analyze all GORETM Modules (field deployed, trip blanks, and QA/QC samples). Calibration standards (five point) containing the target compounds are introduced in the analytical sequence. Field sample results are compared against the calibration standards. If the compound in question satisfies the identification criteria, and it is present in quantities that exceed the method detection limit, we consider it a true result. Compound levels reported from the field installed modules that exceed the method detection limit and any levels observed in the QA blanks, are considered derived from the field. Field samples, trip blanks, and other QA blanks, are subject to the same analytical methods and are analyzed concurrently.
[ Back to Top ]
7. What QA practices do you have in place?
The GORETM Modules are constructed in a clean room. Before the modules are shipped to the field, they must pass internal QA criteria for cleanliness and "fitness-for-use." Modules shipped to the field are accompanied by trip blanks. Trip blanks are selected, by the consultant, from the shipment of modules slated for installation. They are left unopened and travel from Gore to the client, to the field during the installation and retrieval, and then returned to Gore with the rest of the modules. Trip blanks document any ambient contamination that may have occurred during the travel and storage of the modules away from Gore.
Each module is stored in individual glass jars, uniquely labeled with its own serial number. The jar lids have excellent sealing capabilities, and custody seals are affixed to the lid and jar. Completed modules are stored in zero-contamination cabinets until an order is received. All modules are tracked internally by their serial number. All module lots are tested for ambient contamination present during their construction. Module lots that do not meet QA criteria are destroyed.
Analytical QA includes the use of instrument blanks and method blanks to purge the instrument of residual organic vapors, and document ambient impact that may have occurred during the analytical sequence, respectively. These blanks are distributed throughout the analytical sequence.
Mass spectrometer tuning standards are analyzed and must meet QA criteria before a sequence can advance.
The module serial number serves as the Chain of Custody sample ID from the manufacturing through analysis, mapping and reporting.
We do not subcontract any part of our module manufacturing, standard analyses, or reporting to outside contractors.
[ Back to Top ]
8. After GORE™ Module retrieval, will the compounds desorb from the module and be lost before analysis?
Under ambient temperatures, minor desorption of very light compounds may occur naturally from the sorbent. However, the adsorbents are quite tenacious, and hold onto the vapor molecules strongly. The thermal desorption during the analytical process are at temperatures far greater than those experienced during sampling, shipping, and storage of the module. The sample containers are small and have tight, well-sealed lids, minimizing vapor loss during shipping and storage.
[ Back to Top ]
9. What is your typical turn around time after you receive the modules from the field? Can I get the data sooner?
Normal turn around time (TAT) is seven to ten business days to produce a data table after the modules are received at Gore's laboratory. The table is then faxed or emailed to the client. The size of the project will dictate the actual delivery of the results, large projects will require longer TATs. GORETM Modules are analyzed on a "first-in first-out" basis. Expediting services are available for all projects for an extra fee. When requested, a 50% surcharge is added to guarantee a five-business day TAT, a 25% surcharge for a guaranteed ten-business day turn around time, to produce a data table.
[ Back to Top ]
10. How can I gather samples for QA duplicate purposes?
Each module contains a minimum of two samples of adsorbent available for analysis. One sample is analyzed, while the second sample is stored for a period of at least 15 days following the original analytical sequence. This provides a backup sample in the event of an instrument malfunction or if additional QA is required.
In almost all cases, the duplicate results have compared extremely well with the original results. Duplicate values within the same order of magnitude are directly comparable. Often the absolute values between samples and their duplicates are very close.
In the field, additional GORETM Modules can be co-located at each sample location, and also provide data for QA duplicate analyses.
[ Back to Top ]
11. Has your laboratory received any sort of certification from the US EPA, state regulators, or other similar regulatory or governmental agencies?
At present no certifications exist for the analysis of passive vapor samplers. However, Gore has a Quality Assurance Manual, Operating Procedures and Methods, which prescribes and documents all standard operating procedures and QA/QC, from module manufacturing to final reporting, and follows accepted methods of analysis and reporting. The quality assurance program is consistent with Good Laboratory Practices (GLP), ISO Guide 25, "General Requirements for the Competence of Calibration and Testing Laboratories," third edition, 1990, and NELAP. We are routinely audited internally, and have been audited by external parties. The GORE™ Survey usually meets EPA Level 1 and Level 2 Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) to assist in determining the presence and distribution of organic compounds.
[ Back to Top ]
1. How can I tie two or more GORE™ Surveys together?
In some cases, when an initial site characterization indicates the extent of the subsurface impact extends beyond the sampled area, an additional soil gas survey(s) is implemented. Gore recommends that GORETM Modules be deployed as soon as practical, and that several new modules be placed at locations of prior modules (co-located). Gore suggests co-locating the modules at locations covering the range of the mass levels reported, from non-detects to maximum levels, from the original survey. This will provide duplicity in the data, and tie the surveys together. By holding variables such as exposure time, installation depth, and analytical procedures constant from one survey to the next, Gore is confident the results from two or more surveys are comparable. The results can be combined onto one set of maps providing a comprehensive, accurate view of the subsurface impact.
[ Back to Top ]
2. How well do your soil gas results correlate with groundwater and soil data?
In general, the results have a strong positive relative correlation between the soil gas data and what is observed during subsequent matrix sampling. In other words, at locations where the soil gas levels are high, there is a corresponding high probability that the compound is present in the subsurface. With lower soil gas levels, the probability of finding the compound decreases.
[ Back to Top ]
3. How can I relate your soil gas levels to subsurface contamination?
The GORE™ Survey delineates overall contamination from the soil and groundwater. However, by placing the GORETM Module directly in the aquifer, via a piezometer or monitoring well, a groundwater concentration result can be reported.
[ Back to Top ]
4. What is the best way to interpret your soil gas data?
In most site characterization programs, the soil gas data delineates the nature and extent of the subsurface impact by volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds. The soil gas data at a sample location can be compared relative to the soil gas data reported from the other sample locations across the site. Even if the soil gas mass levels are fairly low, patterns in the spatial distribution will appear indicating the area(s) of greatest subsurface impact. It is in these areas, that subsequent matrix sampling should occur.
[ Back to Top ]
5. Are your data reported in units of concentration?
On a standard basis, Gore reports air, soil gas, subslab vapor and water data, by target compound desorbed from the GORETM Module, in units of micrograms (mass). However, upon your request, concentration data can be reported for modules deployed in any of these sampling environments. An accurate recording of the exposure period is required. For soil gas, you will also need to provide soil porosity and percent water saturation values.
[ Back to Top ]
6. What method(s) are used to generate concentration data in vapor from the GORETM Module?
Several methods exist in the literature (e.g., ASTM, MDHS, NIOSH, and others) which document clearly the procedure to calculate vapor concentration data from a passive, sorbent-based sampler such as the GORETM Module. These methods describe the requirements to determine the uptake rate of the sampler over time (volume of vapor), and correction factors for the sampler, sorbent and analytical method. Combined with the mass desorbed from the sampler, the concentration is readily calculated. The body of literature in general on passive sampling and concentration data reporting is quite large, and stems from decades of research in the industrial hygiene arena.
For soil gas sampling, including a correction factor that accounts for soil porosity and moisture content is necessary.
[ Back to Top ]
7. Can you monitor contaminant changes, in soil gas over time, as a result of natural or stimulated soil and groundwater remediation?
Yes! One application of the GORE™ Survey is to track the changes in contaminant levels over time in the subsurface. By placing the collectors in the same locations during each sampling event, holding the exposure time constant from sample event to sample event, applying an identical analytical process to every module, and holding the color contour interval scheme constant, changes in soil gas contaminant levels are readily observed. With this technique, you can monitor the affects of your natural or stimulated remediation program. Similarly, you can monitor changes in contamination following a property transfer.
[ Back to Top ]